By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
PHX VIBESPHX VIBESPHX VIBES
  • Local
  • News
  • Arizona
  • Politics
  • Sports
Reading: Court rebukes Maricopa County’s mugshot policy
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
PHX VIBESPHX VIBES
Font ResizerAa
  • Local
  • News
  • Arizona
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Local
  • News
  • Arizona
  • Politics
  • Sports
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
Copyright © 2024 PHX VIBES. All Rights Reserved.
PHX VIBES > Blog > Arizona > Court rebukes Maricopa County’s mugshot policy
Arizona

Court rebukes Maricopa County’s mugshot policy

PHX Team
Last updated: 2024/09/06 at 6:01 PM
PHX Team 9 months ago
Share
Court rebukes Maricopa County’s mugshot policy
SHARE

Contents
Maricopa County’s Mugshot Publishing Ruled Unconstitutional by Federal JudgesStay Informed with 12News

Maricopa County’s Mugshot Publishing Ruled Unconstitutional by Federal Judges

A recent ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has deemed Maricopa County’s practice of posting mugshots and personal information of individuals booked into their jail as unconstitutional. The decision came in response to a complaint filed by a man who was arrested on an assault charge in 2022 which was later dropped.

The court found that the county’s policy of displaying individuals’ names, dates of birth, height, weight, and hair color on their website could unfairly punish those who have not been convicted of a crime. The “Mugshot Lookup” website maintained by the sheriff’s office lists recent bookings along with detailed personal information and charges.

While transparency is important, the judges concluded that the county’s approach went too far in disclosing sensitive details about individuals. The ruling stated that there was no rational connection between the goal of transparency and the gratuitous release of personal information.

The plaintiff’s due process claims were dismissed by a district court initially, but upon appeal, the 9th Circuit judges reversed the decision. They found that the plaintiff had a valid substantive due process claim against the County for pretrial punishment.

This landmark ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of balancing transparency with individual privacy rights. Stay informed on this developing story by downloading the 12News app for the latest updates.

Stay Informed with 12News

You Might Also Like

Woman mistakenly declared dead by Social Security

Sheriff: 16-Year-Old Injured by Drunk Driver in Arizona

Walmart to pay $100K for Arizona cashier’s alleged wrongful termination

Marana Officer on leave for alleged off-duty drunk incident

¿Suben precios Feria Estatal de Arizona?

PHX Team September 6, 2024 September 6, 2024
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Trump’s sentencing delayed until after Election Day Trump’s sentencing delayed until after Election Day
Next Article Brazilian music legend Sergio Mendes dies at 83 Brazilian music legend Sergio Mendes dies at 83
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

about us

PHX Vibes is your go-to source for the latest and most engaging local news, events, and lifestyle stories in Phoenix, Arizona.

  • Local
  • News
  • Arizona
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Find Us on Socials

Copyright © 2024 PHX VIBES. All Rights Reserved.
Join Us!

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..

Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?