A Gila County resident is gearing up to take legal action against the town of Payson after they recently approved a $70-million bond resolution. This move has sparked controversy and raised concerns about transparency and citizen rights in the community.
The Goldwater Institute, a nonprofit organization, has stepped in to assist Deborah Rose, the resident planning to sue Payson. They argue that town officials exploited a legal loophole to circumvent the constitutional rights of the town’s citizens.
Last month, the town council passed a resolution to authorize the sale of $70 million in bonds under an “emergency clause,” effectively bypassing the need for a voter referendum. This has raised questions about the true intentions behind this move and whether it truly serves the best interests of the community.
According to Arizona law, an emergency clause can only be invoked for matters relating to the peace, health, or safety of the city or town. The lack of concrete justification for this clause has only fueled suspicions about the transparency of the decision-making process.
The bond funding is earmarked for upgrading town facilities and potentially constructing a new community center, as reported by the Payson Roundup. However, the legality and ethical considerations surrounding this funding have come under intense scrutiny.
The Goldwater Institute is seeking legal recourse to halt the implementation of the bond resolution and compel Payson to uphold the principles of democratic participation by allowing local voters the right to challenge and vote on significant financial measures.
Stay Informed
