During the recent debate, Vice President Kamala Harris wore a stunning pair of Tiffany pearl earrings that caught the attention of many viewers. However, some false claims started circulating on social media suggesting that Harris was wearing “audio” or “earphone” earrings to receive secret coaching during the debate, which would have been a violation of the debate rules.
Conservative commentator Laura Loomer even amplified these claims on social media, further fueling the speculation. Photos of Nova H1 audio earrings were shared online, describing them as the first wireless earphones embedded in a pair of pearl earrings. However, it’s essential to note that these claims were unfounded and inaccurate.
The Question
Did Kamala Harris wear Nova H1 audio earrings during the Sept. 10 presidential debate?
The Answer
No, Kamala Harris did not wear Nova H1 audio earrings during the presidential debate. There are clear differences between these earrings and the pair Harris wore during the debate.
What We Found
While the pearl earrings worn by Harris may have appeared similar to the Nova H1 earrings at first glance, a closer look reveals distinct differences between the two. Harris’ earrings were identified as Tiffany & Co. pearl earrings from the HardWear collection, not the Nova H1 audio earrings falsely claimed by some on social media.
The Nova H1 audio earrings, manufactured by Icebach Sound Solutions, are wireless earphones that come in a pair of pearl earrings with a bulky front and back clip that fastens around the earlobe. In contrast, Harris’ earrings have a pearl and two prongs encircling her earlobe in a unique “J” shape.
Photos taken by the Associated Press clearly show that Harris was wearing a different style of earrings during the debate, confirming that the claims about her wearing audio earrings were baseless.
Harris’ choice of earrings reflects her impeccable style, as the pearl earrings from Tiffany’s HardWear collection are a sophisticated and elegant accessory that she has worn on various occasions. Despite the false rumors, it’s essential to differentiate between the factual information and the misleading claims circulating on social media.
ABC News’ debate rules explicitly prohibited the use of props on stage, ensuring a fair and unbiased environment for both candidates. It’s crucial to rely on verified sources and reputable information to avoid falling prey to misinformation and false narratives.
While false claims and rumors are unfortunately common in the political landscape, it’s imperative to fact-check and verify information before spreading it further. We must prioritize accuracy and truth in our discussions and debates to maintain integrity and transparency in our democracy.
