The Truth About Kamala Harris and the Border Wall

As the upcoming presidential election looms closer, immigration remains a hot-button issue, especially concerning the southern U.S. border. Despite a decrease in migrant numbers from record highs last year, the issue of border security continues to be a priority for politicians.

Vice President Kamala Harris has come under fire from Republicans who claim she has reversed her stance on the Trump-era border wall initiative. However, Harris has not explicitly endorsed building the wall. Instead, she has expressed her willingness to sign a bipartisan border security deal that includes unspent funding allocated for the wall.

Republican critics, including Rep. Greg Steube and Sen. JD Vance, have accused Harris of flip-flopping on her position regarding the border wall. They highlight her recent statements pledging to allocate taxpayer dollars to continue building the wall as contradictory to her previous criticisms of the project.

The Question

So, does Kamala Harris actually support building Trump’s border wall?

The Answer

Contrary to the claims, Kamala Harris has not voiced support for Trump’s border wall. Her backing of a bipartisan border security package, which includes repurposing unspent wall funding for other security measures, does not equate to endorsing the wall’s construction.

What We Found

The proposed Border Act of 2024, negotiated by Senators Chris Murphy and James Lankford, aims to strike a balance between Republican and Democratic priorities. This bill includes reallocation of funds for border wall construction, among other border security and immigration reforms.

While the bill did not pass through the Senate, it illustrates the complexities of addressing border security in a bipartisan manner. The reallocation of funds for border wall construction within the bill does not signify newfound support from Harris for the wall.

In conclusion, the situation is nuanced, and it is crucial to examine all aspects of the proposed legislation and Harris’s statements rather than simplifying the issue into a black-and-white narrative of support for the border wall.